… the row marked “year remodeled.” It doesn’t have an “i” link for more
information.
How is this defined, and more importantly, what is the
impact on valuation?
What constitutes a “remodel?” Is there some way to distinguish by the year
entered in that column that the new counter-top and faucets in the kitchen of
property #1 is not equivalent to the full kitchen and three bath gut-and-replace
that was done to property #2? Or is
property #1 penalized with the same adjustment calculation as property #2
because they’re both categorized simply as “remodeled?”
And what about patios and decks? Is there something coded secretly in the measurement
of the square footage that indicates that these two patios are not equal? Or is a patio a patio and a deck is deck in
the eyes of the assessor’s office and nothing matters but size?
http://samtheconcreteman-cincinnati.com
|
I’m willing to bet there isn’t a secret code behind the
measurement. If there is, how was my
non-existent 525 sq ft deck coded?
The fact is that the County Assessor’s office is not doing a
decent job on the inspections that they’re already required to do by law. Seems very unlikely they could correctly code
the individual property features.
That would be fine if the secondary property aspects were
just informational and didn’t actually factor into the assessment calculations.
The problem is
that County is still assessing properties using this generic measurement data,
so in their calculations, presuming the same square footage, the patio on the
left will be valued the same as the patio on the right.
Of course, I could be wrong, but there certainly isn't anything available online for property owners to view. And even if so, my own experience with my deck makes me highly doubt it would be accurate.
Of course, I could be wrong, but there certainly isn't anything available online for property owners to view. And even if so, my own experience with my deck makes me highly doubt it would be accurate.



No comments:
Post a Comment